Hi,
I have a few additional comments/corrections to the NIM paper. Page
numbers start with the front page.
p.2 col 2 versus p.5 col 2:  Please choose between p(||) and p(par)
Fig 2 caption.   The ZDCs (not depicted) --> The ZDCs
Fig 2. Arrow pointing to TOFW should be longer.
Fig 2. Could the beam pipe be continued at least up to the DX magnets?
p.11, Drift Chambers:  change first sentance to:
   The Drift Chambers (DCs) employed in BRAHMS will be ...
p.11, col 2 mid:  A small quantity of the ethylene --> 
                  A small quantity of ethylene
p.12, par 1 end:  The multiplexing is used for the T4 and T5 DCs. -->
                  This multiplexing is used for T4 and T5.
p.12, par 2:   82 um in the position resolution, somewhat ... -->
               82 um, somewhat ...
Fig 12:  use the new one from Djamel
Fig 12 caption:  length of a slat (y-direction). -->
                 length of the slag (y direction).
p.15 col 2 middle:  630 torr --> 840 mbar
p.19 par 2:   The two kinds of modules used in the arrays. -->
              Two kinds of modules are used in the arrays.
p.21 col 1 last par:  IP --> Interaction Point
                      DAQ --> Data Acquisition 
p.22 col 1 middle: A rough vertex selection based on a making -->
                   A rough vertex selection based on making
p.22 col2 last par: Switched Capacitor Array -->
                    Switched Capacitor Array (SCA)
p.23 col 1, middle: an amount depending on the filling factors of -->
                    an amount that depends on the filling factors of
           Note: to my taste of English there are far too many -ing
                 endings in this section. Many more could be reformulated
                 similarly to the above suggestion.
p.23 col 1, middle:  in a 10 bit ADC's -->
          either:  in a 10 bit ADC
          or:      in 10 bit ADCs
Fig 29:  replace by the new one from Djamel
Fig 29 caption: ... pions, kaons and protons. The solid ...  curve. -->
                ... pions, kaons, protons and deuterons.
Fig 30.  This figure clearly displays a wrong refractive index, but I
         think Claus has produced a better one. Please replace.
Regards,
Borge
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Børge Svane Nielsen                 E-mail:  borge@nbi.dk              |
| Technical Coordinator               http://www.nbi.dk/TECHI            |
| Niels Bohr Institute                Phone:   (+45) 3532 5433           |
| University of Copenhagen            Fax:     (+45) 3532 5465           |
| Blegdamsvej 17,  DK-2100 Copenhagen O,  Denmark                        |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 05 2001 - 03:24:15 EDT