Hi Kris,
nice paper. A few last comments:
Page 2: The formulas for pt, pp and y look ugly.
Page 11: The paragraph on the performance of the TPCs is a little bit too
simplistic. A better way to do it is in Jens Ivar's thesis (in
http://www.fi.uib.no/~jens/physics.html), but I guess it is too
late to rewrite this part. But at least we have to say in Table4,
for what kind of tracks the residuals are given (pad and wire
crossing angles, drift distances, etc.).
Page 28: Fig 27: I guess we want to show the systematic errors of our
dn/deta measurements. We should then plot the deviations of the
various detectors from the average instead a dn/deta distr.
where you can hardly see anything.
With best wishes,
DIeter
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dieter Roehrich |
Fysisk institutt | Email: Dieter.Rohrich@fi.uib.no
Universitetet i Bergen | Tel: +47-555-82722
Allegt. 55 | Fax: +47-555-89440
N-5007 Bergen, Norway | WWW: http://www.fi.uib.no/php/drhrich.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Oct 16 2001 - 05:48:06 EDT