net-proton at y=0

From: J.H. Lee (jhlee@sgs1.hirg.bnl.gov)
Date: Fri Jul 12 2002 - 14:55:20 EDT

  • Next message: Djamel Ouerdane: "Re: Update on analysis at very high rapidities"

    Dear Collaborators,
    
    Here are some distributions for the net-proton at y=0 for 5%.
    We'll post more (5-20% and at 40 degree) soon. 
    
    Attached figures.
    1. proton, pbar yields (dN/dydpt) 
        (Estimated integral coverage ~ 80-85%)
        Please look at "integral" in statistics box.
        p - pbar =  29.15 - 22.08 = 7.07 for pt 0.6 - 3GeV/c
        p - pbar =  36.44 - 27.6 = 8.84 for all extrapolated phase space  
                                                     assuming 80% coverage)
        Estimated error is ~20% on the number.
    
    2. proton, pbar invariant pt spectra
    3. pbar/p ratio
    4. pi plus invariant pt with exponential fit
    5. pi minus invariant pt with exponential fit
    
    
    If you are interested in more details for the analysis... 
    
        Event Selection:
    -   Events are required to have BB and ZDC vertex. 
    -   Trigger6 only
    -   Centrality cut was only using fMultCent 
    
        Track Selection:
    -   Tracks have to come from BB vertex
    -    -17.5 < Track z < 17.5 cm
    -   Track matching cuts 
         Run-by-run  fit with Gaussian +  2nd pol
      * Since the distributions of the matching parameters are not exactly Gaussian,
         the distribution (p2) under the Gaussian peak is overestimating background.      
         It's due to various reasons (especially non-uniformity of drift velocity
         and the "angle problem").
         If you take  3*rms, it's about 4*sigma. 
    
         Efficiency:
    -    Tracking 
         Based on the rough estimates/preliminary numbers from Oslo/hardware
         performance,...
         reconstruction efficiency for the events with highest number of clusters
         in TPM1: 95% and TPM2: 97% at 90 degree.
         This function is used for 40 degree runs, which will give ~90% for most central.
    -    ToF efficiency
          My old estimate was around ~95%, but we took Peter's new estimate: 90% flat
    
         Other corrections:
    -    multiple scattering  
      
         Acceptance:
    -    Each field setting,  the first bin is not included in the summed distribution
         to reduce acceptance edge effect. 
    
    
    JH + EJK
    
    
    
    







    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jul 12 2002 - 15:01:06 EDT