Hi Flemming, Actually, I've checked these angles (phi, theta) in the MC and data. I'll make some plots. The ranges are similar, only the shapes differ due to different distributions. The acceptance correction maps used the magnet fiducial cuts used in the reconstruction (I checked the script the "official" Reco.C). The track status is also checked in the MC like for real data. The centrality was mentionned on the top of the webpage (0 to 10). For the efficiencies, I'll make what you're suggesting. Djam -- Djamel Ouerdane ------------------------------------------o | Niels Bohr Institute | Home: | | Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Ø | Jagtvej 141 2D, | | Fax: +45 35 32 50 16 | DK-2200 Copenhagen N | | Tel: +45 35 32 52 69 | +45 35 86 19 74 | | http://www.nbi.dk/~ouerdane | | ouerdane@nbi.dk | o---------------------------------------------------------o
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jul 12 2002 - 15:10:20 EDT