Re: Update on analysis at very high rapidities

From: Djamel Ouerdane (ouerdane@nbi.dk)
Date: Fri Jul 12 2002 - 14:42:36 EDT

  • Next message: J.H. Lee: "net-proton at y=0"

    hi Dieter,
    
    
    > 
    > Dear Djamel,
    > 
    > very interesting data. I had a brief look, a few comments:
    > 
    > K-/K+ (y=3.13) = 0.822. We just published 0.67. Something wrong
    > with K- at y=3.13? 
    
    
    This is related to what I was saying : the fit range drives everything, 
    since this range is not big (yield under curve around 20 %), 
    the yield extrapolation can introduce this. If I select another pt range 
    as well as another y width, this might change. Not drastically but 
    significantly. I'll make a plot.
    
    
    > 
    > K+/pi+ (y=3.2) = ((17.4+20.8)/2) / 74.6 = 25%
    > At midrapidity we (and others) have measured about 15%. 
    > Up to now (AGS, SPS) I have only seen ratios that peak at midrapidity or
    > stay constant. The K/pi ratio has to go down at large (say 4-5) 
    > rapidities, because the K y-spectra is usually narrower than the pi.
    > Taking your results seriously would mean that the K+/pi+ ratio peaks way
    > from midrapidity, say at y=3. This would be very interesting, 
    
    indeed :)
    
    > but we need
    > the rapidity spectra for K and pi in order to check shapes and widths.
    > 
    > K-/pi- (y=3.2) = ((11.6+17.1)/2) / 78.3 = 18%
    > This is strange. I cannot imagine any scenario where the k-/pi-
    > peaks away from midrapidity (14.6% - STAR).
    
    see comment above.
    
    
    > 
    > I think that something is fishy with your yields.
    > Maybe the small pt-acceptance for kaons? Can you add another
    > field/angle setting that covers lower pt so we get smaller extrapolation
    > factors (less than a factor 5)?
    
    
    I'll try another setting that I have checked yet (the acceptance 
    correction maps were not produced due to a stupid mistake).
    
    
    > 
    > With best wishes,
    > Dieter
    > 
    > PS. concerning K/pi vs pt: since the mt-slopes are almost the same
    > (200 +-10) you expect a flat ratio, or?
    > 
    
    'f course, it's just that if you take the points plotted on the pt 
    distributions, and make the ratio yourself, you might find a ratio 
    slightly increasing with pt but it's not relevant considering the errors 
    on the slopes.
    
    Djam
    
    
    Djamel Ouerdane ------------------------------------------o
    |  Niels Bohr Institute      |  Home:                     |
    |  Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Ø |  Jagtvej 141 2D,           |
    |  Fax: +45 35 32 50 16      |  DK-2200 Copenhagen N      |
    |  Tel: +45 35 32 52 69      |  +45 35 86 19 74           |
    |                  http://www.nbi.dk/~ouerdane            |
    |                  ouerdane@nbi.dk                        |
    o---------------------------------------------------------o
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jul 12 2002 - 14:43:37 EDT