Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it.

From: Michael Murray (murray@CyclotronMail.tamu.edu)
Date: Tue Nov 20 2001 - 12:42:31 EST

Next message: Stephen J. Sanders: "Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it."

Previous message: Flemming Videbaek: "Fw: Bb response at 22 GeV"
In reply to: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje: "MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it."
Next in thread: Stephen J. Sanders: "Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it."
Reply: Stephen J. Sanders: "Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it."
Reply: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje: "Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

     Dear Jens,
            how about 
  \title{Role of parton collisions in   particle production
            for AuAu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV}
This has the advantage that it fits on one line in PRL format.
Also should not the abstract mention limiting fragmentation since
this is one of our contributions. 
  It is just about possible to fit table 1 into one column. However
we may want to consider making it two column and adding more
pseudo-rapidity columns.
  Are we actually using the silicon in the analysis? If not we
should drop the discussion about averageing the Si and tiles.
It would be easier to compare alpha and beta values at eta=0 and
3 and 130 and 200GeV in a small table.
              Yours Michael

Next message: Stephen J. Sanders: "Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it."
Previous message: Flemming Videbaek: "Fw: Bb response at 22 GeV"
In reply to: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje: "MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it."
Next in thread: Stephen J. Sanders: "Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it."
Reply: Stephen J. Sanders: "Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it."
Reply: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje: "Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Nov 20 2001 - 12:42:58 EST