Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it.

From: Stephen J. Sanders (ssanders@ku.edu)
Date: Tue Nov 20 2001 - 12:49:03 EST

Next message: Stephen J. Sanders: "latest draft now available on kansas account"

Previous message: Michael Murray: "Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it."
In reply to: Michael Murray: "Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it."
Next in thread: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje: "Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Michael,  If there is actually a question as to whether we are using
Si in the analysis, then we really have a problem with the text! 
But yes, the multiplicity is done by averaging the si and the
tile.  The distributions in the central region are exclusively
si data.
...steve

> 
>   Are we actually using the silicon in the analysis? If not we
> should drop the discussion about averageing the Si and tiles.
> It would be easier to compare alpha and beta values at eta=0 and
> 3 and 130 and 200GeV in a small table.
>               Yours Michael

Next message: Stephen J. Sanders: "latest draft now available on kansas account"
Previous message: Michael Murray: "Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it."
In reply to: Michael Murray: "Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it."
Next in thread: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje: "Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Nov 20 2001 - 12:49:59 EST