Hello Michael
> Dear Jens,
> how about
> \title{Role of parton collisions in particle production
> for AuAu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV}
The opinion was put forward that sqrt(s) is more specialized than 100+100.
I have no strong opinion regarding this.
> This has the advantage that it fits on one line in PRL format.¨
> Also should not the abstract mention limiting fragmentation since
> this is one of our contributions.
We had it in, but had to cut on the length of the abstract, so we dropped
it.
This is just physics but practical details.
> It is just about possible to fit table 1 into one column. However
> we may want to consider making it two column and adding more
> pseudo-rapidity columns.
I agree that if we cannot fit the table into 1 column we should utilize the
space and
add more information.
> Are we actually using the silicon in the analysis? If not we
> should drop the discussion about averageing the Si and tiles.
We are only using the Si - well, for the dN/deta that is. For the cent. cuts
Hiro and Steve use a sum of Si+Tiles vs BB.
> It would be easier to compare alpha and beta values at eta=0 and
> 3 and 130 and 200GeV in a small table.
Agreed, but space is at at premium. We may still have to cut sentences here
and there.
> Yours Michael
Cheers
JJ
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Nov 20 2001 - 15:22:07 EST