MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it.

From: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje (gardhoje@nbi.dk)
Date: Tue Nov 20 2001 - 09:40:57 EST

  • Next message: Flemming Videbaek: "Fw: Bb response at 22 GeV"

    Dear  friends,
    
    Attached please find version 3.3 of the paper. Steve and I consider this the
    final version, i.e. the one that goes for discussion to the collaboration.
    We hope for many constructive comments.
    
    Steve has updated all tables and numbers. Michael has contributed with
    references and a revtex 4 version. Hiro has made the figures
    (inspect the kansas account :  pii3.brahms.bnl.gov/~kansas/dndeta01/ )
    
    I'm sure that Steve (when he wakes up EST) will update the kansas account
    with this document and with the latest
    figures (1-5 and alternative 5), so that it will available to all later this
    evening.
    
    There has been a fair discussion with many people already -also outside the
    paper committee- on the figures and the associated text.
    It appears that there is a majority that favor the Npart plot (fig.5 ) over
    the Nch plot (alternative fig. 5) and a majority in favor of keeping the
    fragmentation plot (fig.2.). This is also Steve's and my point of view.
    So this is the format of the present paper.
    
    There has been discussion on the title over the last 24 hrs.: I have
    tentatively invented a new title - which I actually think is not just
    populistic:
    'Role of parton collisions in the production of charged particles in
    100AGeV+100AGeV Au+AU collisions at RHIC.'
    
    This is in fact what we explore via the measurements and the comparisons to
    the relevant models.
    The old and very standard title is commented out in the paper.
    
    There are obviously details that will need to be adjusted in the text, also
    based on input from the entire
    collaboration, but the data and thus the basic results are not expected to
    change. The rest is thus mainly details of presentation and perhaps some
    fine tuning of the text length.
    
    We are prepared to announce tomorrow, wednesday, the paper to BNL and the
    other experiments.
    This just entails submitting the title and the abstract (SO COMMENT
    IMMEDIATELY ON THIS; PLEASE).
    
    The ambition is to receive input from all interested parties very rapidly
    (by the end of the week) so that (depending on the degree of criticism by
    sceptics) we may be ready to post the entire draft to the other RHIC
    spokespeople by early next week and submit to PRL shortly afterwards.
    
    cheers
    JJ
    
    
    
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Nov 20 2001 - 09:42:35 EST