From: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje (gardhoje@nbi.dk)
Date: Sun Aug 31 2003 - 15:32:46 EDT
Hi Flemming, Here are my latest (and last) comments to the Rbup - in red and overstrike! Suitable that it is labor day weekend! You have with Salomonic skill defused the lower energy vs ligther ion discussion. cheers JJ ____________________________________________________________ Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Sc. Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. Tlf: (+45) 35 32 53 09, secr. (+45) 35 32 52 09, Fax: (+45) 35 32 50 16. UNESCO Natl. Comm., secr. (+45) 33 92 52 16. Email: gardhoje@nbi.dk. ____________________________________________________________ ----- Original Message ----- From: Flemming Videbaek To: brahms-l@bnl.gov Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 7:48 PM Subject: BRAHMS beam use proposal Dear Collaborator, Due to the Labour day weekend the final-final deadline is not today Sunday but rather that it is available Tusday Morning for Tom Kirk. Since I will likely be away from the lab most of next week I will like to send it to Kirk by tomorrow Monday late afternoon. The version enclosed is based on the general comments received from NBI, Oslo, Bergen, Krakow together with detailed contributioins, corrections and suggestions from Dana,Chellis, Ramiro, Michael Murray, Steve and Brendan Fox. From the discussions so far there is obvious not a consensus on the secondary goals, so the present version represents my be best attempts to consolidate the points of view. There will be an opportunity to develop the arguments for the presentation to the PAC on September 29. I will review and includes as best possible comments received by Monday at 2 pm EDT (19.00 GMT). I think the d-Au, both because it is actually uncertain how stong such request is, and how the collaboration could handle this in terms of man-power has to be qualified - and thus not a definite request. In all cases it should come following the other programs. At some level it really belongs better in the 'future' document - maybe this should be said here. For this reason the text enclose two alternatives for this section, one written by Ramiro ,and another by Michael+additions from me. Please comment on this. I will value comments, and if suggestions then specifics textual changes. The most recent e-mail from Kirk indicates that the PAC will be mainly concerned with the Run-4, such that actual decisions on run 5,6 will be part of this falls longer term planning with the PAC meeting once again late fall (November). regards Flemming ------------------------------------------------------ Flemming Videbaek Physics Department Brookhaven National Laboratory tlf: 631-344-4106 fax 631-344-1334 e-mail: videbaek@bnl.gov -- Flemming Videbaek Brookhaven National Laboratory Physics Department tlf 631-344-4106 fax 631-344-1334 e-mail: videbaek@bnl.gov
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 31 2003 - 15:39:35 EDT