Hiro, I fully agree with you that the figures "look good enough" to start discussing about publishing the results. I have a couple of requests and questions on the figures/analysis. Could you please - plot the distribution with statistical error bars only? - plot BB and Si multiplicities separately without averaging them? - Are the numbers from Tiles consistently higher than what Si and BB produce like 130 GeV data? - I think there still is a quite visible asymmetry between +eta and -eta (~5-10%?). I'm wondering if Tiles show same asymmetry. JH ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hironori Ito" <hito@students.phsx.ukans.edu> To: <brahms-l@bnl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 1:22 AM Subject: new dndeta figures! (still BETA) > Hello. I made new 4 dndeta figures with new calibration. They > are still preliminary, so you are not allowed to show them outside of the > collaboration without the consent of the spokes person. However, it is > good enough for some people to start discussing a more detail of our new > paper. The files are located in > "http://pii3.brahms.bnl.gov/~hito/dndeta/2001" > > Here is the list of 4 figures. > 1. dndeta_all.gif > dndeta for 6 centrality cuts by average of silicon and beam beam. > > 2. dndeta_part.gif > dndeta par participant pair for 6 centrality cuts by average of > silicon and beam beam. > > 3. dndeta_sym.gif > symetrized dndeta for 6 centrality cuts with the prediction by > Khazeev and Levin(dash-dot line) > > 4. dndeta_part_ybeam.gif > dndeta shifted by ybeam (shown only 0-5 % and 30-40%) > > > hiro > > (Note: Tiles are not included in the figures, but they are still used for > centrality and overall normalization. I am still having trouble matching > Tiles to Si and BB.) >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Oct 10 2001 - 10:37:59 EDT