Hello. I was actually talking about centrality from tile. Does this info/variable needs to be dst? Hiro Johnson, Erik B wrote: >Hiro, > I have never dealt with the bdst classes. So I'm not sure if it is necessary or not. What would need to be updated? Erik > > >________________________________ > >From: Hironori Ito [mailto:hito@rcf.rhic.bnl.gov] >Sent: Sat 11/26/2005 5:29 PM >To: Sanders, Stephen J >Cc: Johnson, Erik B; Brahms Dev >Subject: Re: [Brahms-dev-l] Flow Norm Weights > > > >Did you also change bdst class? Is that necessary? > >Hiro > >Stephen Sanders wrote: > > > >>Yes, The official brat should be updated. Otherwise the new AuAu >>cent calibration >>will not be incorporated in the lastest dsts. >>..steve >>On Nov 25, 2005, at 2:05 PM, Johnson, Erik B wrote: >> >> >> >>>Flemming, >>> I haven't changed anything in brat for about a couple weeks now. >>>So as long as the offical brat has been updated before that then we >>>are good. >>>I know Hiro had a question about the flow code at one point and it >>>looked like he didn't have the newest version. I'm assuming that he >>>resolved this issue. >>>Erik >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Flemming Videbaek [mailto:videbaek@rcf.rhic.bnl.gov] >>>Sent: Fri 11/25/2005 12:56 PM >>>To: Johnson, Erik B; Brahms Dev >>>Subject: Re: [Brahms-dev-l] Flow Norm Weights >>> >>>Hi Erik, >>> >>>Should the official brat be updated before the DSTs for the auau are >>>processed? >>>Let us have an answer before processing starts. >>> >>>Flemming >>> >>>-------------------------------------------- >>>Flemming Videbaek >>>Physics Department >>>Bldg 510-D >>>Brrokhaven National Laboratory >>>Upton, NY11973 >>> >>>phone: 631-344-4106 >>>fax: 631-344-1334 >>>e-mail: videbaek @ bnl.gov >>>----- Original Message ----- >>>From: "Johnson, Erik B" <ebj@ku.edu> >>>To: "Brahms Dev" <brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov> >>>Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 1:52 PM >>>Subject: [Brahms-dev-l] Flow Norm Weights >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Hiro, >>>> Here is an update on the normalization weights. All but 16 runs >>>>have been completed. I don't know what's been happening with >>>>these last sixteen runs, but I have changed the method a little >>>>bit. Instead of processing 1billion events, I limited it to >>>>10million. The results should not change significantly, but the >>>>weight will be calculated faster. I will keep a closer eye on >>>>them. As for the rest of the runs, I have checked them and I have >>>>committed them to the database. I will keep a closer eye on >>>>the last 16 runs over the day and weekend. >>>> If you want to start processing the DSTs there is a list of runs >>>>that DO NOT have the norm weight committed to the database. >>>>9541 - 9546 >>>>9701 - 9711 >>>>9836 - 9836 >>>>9840 - 9840 >>>>9844 - 9844 >>>>9845 - 9845 >>>>9847 - 9849 >>>>9930 - 9930 >>>>9945 - 9945 >>>>10051 - 10054 >>>>10456 - 10456 >>>>10458 - 10458 >>>>10626 - 10626 >>>>10855 - 10875 >>>>10948 - 10952 >>>>11117 - 11129 >>>>These runs are NOT calibrated!!! >>>> >>>> I have rechecked the flow modules and they seem to be working >>>>correctly. >>>> >>>> I will send you an update when more runs are finished. >>>>Erik >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>Brahms-dev-l mailing list >>>>Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov >>>>http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Brahms-dev-l mailing list >>>Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov >>>http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l >>> >>> >>_______________________________________________ >>Brahms-dev-l mailing list >>Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov >>http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l >> >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Sat Nov 26 19:26:52 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Nov 26 2005 - 19:26:58 EST