Hiro, I decided to not wait anymore. The norm weights for all the runs are now set. There were 13 runs that I'm still waiting for to finish. I don't know why these runs are taking so long to finish, but I just set their weighs to the weigts from the previous run. Erik ________________________________ From: Hironori Ito [mailto:hito@rcf.rhic.bnl.gov] Sent: Sat 11/26/2005 5:29 PM To: Sanders, Stephen J Cc: Johnson, Erik B; Brahms Dev Subject: Re: [Brahms-dev-l] Flow Norm Weights Did you also change bdst class? Is that necessary? Hiro Stephen Sanders wrote: > Yes, The official brat should be updated. Otherwise the new AuAu > cent calibration > will not be incorporated in the lastest dsts. > ..steve > On Nov 25, 2005, at 2:05 PM, Johnson, Erik B wrote: > >> >> Flemming, >> I haven't changed anything in brat for about a couple weeks now. >> So as long as the offical brat has been updated before that then we >> are good. >> I know Hiro had a question about the flow code at one point and it >> looked like he didn't have the newest version. I'm assuming that he >> resolved this issue. >> Erik >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Flemming Videbaek [mailto:videbaek@rcf.rhic.bnl.gov] >> Sent: Fri 11/25/2005 12:56 PM >> To: Johnson, Erik B; Brahms Dev >> Subject: Re: [Brahms-dev-l] Flow Norm Weights >> >> Hi Erik, >> >> Should the official brat be updated before the DSTs for the auau are >> processed? >> Let us have an answer before processing starts. >> >> Flemming >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> Flemming Videbaek >> Physics Department >> Bldg 510-D >> Brrokhaven National Laboratory >> Upton, NY11973 >> >> phone: 631-344-4106 >> fax: 631-344-1334 >> e-mail: videbaek @ bnl.gov >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Johnson, Erik B" <ebj@ku.edu> >> To: "Brahms Dev" <brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov> >> Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 1:52 PM >> Subject: [Brahms-dev-l] Flow Norm Weights >> >> >>> >>> Hiro, >>> Here is an update on the normalization weights. All but 16 runs >>> have been completed. I don't know what's been happening with >>> these last sixteen runs, but I have changed the method a little >>> bit. Instead of processing 1billion events, I limited it to >>> 10million. The results should not change significantly, but the >>> weight will be calculated faster. I will keep a closer eye on >>> them. As for the rest of the runs, I have checked them and I have >>> committed them to the database. I will keep a closer eye on >>> the last 16 runs over the day and weekend. >>> If you want to start processing the DSTs there is a list of runs >>> that DO NOT have the norm weight committed to the database. >>> 9541 - 9546 >>> 9701 - 9711 >>> 9836 - 9836 >>> 9840 - 9840 >>> 9844 - 9844 >>> 9845 - 9845 >>> 9847 - 9849 >>> 9930 - 9930 >>> 9945 - 9945 >>> 10051 - 10054 >>> 10456 - 10456 >>> 10458 - 10458 >>> 10626 - 10626 >>> 10855 - 10875 >>> 10948 - 10952 >>> 11117 - 11129 >>> These runs are NOT calibrated!!! >>> >>> I have rechecked the flow modules and they seem to be working >>> correctly. >>> >>> I will send you an update when more runs are finished. >>> Erik >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Brahms-dev-l mailing list >>> Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov >>> http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Brahms-dev-l mailing list >> Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov >> http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Brahms-dev-l mailing list > Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov > http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Sat Nov 26 18:52:43 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Nov 26 2005 - 18:52:49 EST