Hi, Michael, > > Dear JH, > this seems like a good idea. I think so too. ;) > why aren't the > different a regions symetric about the peak? It seemed to me > that you were only using 7 regions but that your index ran over 8. The distribution is (assumed to be) symmetric around the vertex position. The 8th region (A8) is simply not shown on the plot. JH > > -----Original Message----- > From: J.H. Lee [mailto:jhlee@sgs1.hirg.bnl.gov] > Sent: Sat 1/24/2004 9:49 AM > To: 'BRAHMS Software list' > Cc: > Subject: [Brahms-dev-l] Acceptance Weighting for dAu and > pp at ForwardRapidities > > Hi, > > As we all know, picking up a right acceptance map > for a given z at small angle is tricky due to a limited > accuracy on determining the origin of the track. > it's especially an issue for dAu and pp data since > BB vertices are available only for a fraction of event. > > Here is what I believe one of the ways to accommodate > the uncertainties in applying z dependent acceptance weight. > This method doesn't require generating new maps and > has been "successfully" adapted in the Ramiro's analysis. > http://pii3.brahms.bnl.gov/~jhlee/brahms/analysis/acceptance/new_acceptance_ weighting_for_forward_in_dAu.pdf Cheers, JH _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Mon Jan 26 09:55:50 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 26 2004 - 09:56:09 EST