Hi, I think you didn't get the point. It is written in capital in my previous email. If you think this point is bad, the tags exist so that a user can retrieve the version he wants. Djam Djamel Ouerdane ------------------------------------------o | Niels Bohr Intstitute | Home: | | Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Ø | Jagtvej 141 2D, | | Fax: +45 35 32 50 16 | DK-2200 Copenhagen N | | Tel: +45 35 32 52 69 | +45 35 86 19 74 | | http://www.nbi.dk/~ouerdane | | ouerdane@nbi.dk | o---------------------------------------------------------o On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Kris Hagel wrote: > I second the lack of wisdom of randomly changing class names for the sole > purpose of changing something. On the other hand, Ian is probably wise not > discuss it, because I have discussed it a number of times and the effect has > been very close to null. > > Kris > > Ian Bearden wrote: > > > Hello deviants, > > I checked out the latest version of BRAT (cf. Djamel's email earlier today). > > It did not compile. The first (and only, so far) problem is that the change > > of names from FFS->Ffs and MRS->Mrs were not propagated to BrParticle.h. I > > will not check in the change since it seems that BrParticle is not used, and > > should either be justified or removed. I choose not to discuss the wisdom > > (or amazing lack thereof) of wasting time changing beautiful, descriptive > > names to (essentially) the same name in a harder to read format. > > Ian > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Nov 05 2001 - 14:18:46 EST