Hi Jens Ivar, et al, On Mon, 05 Nov 2001 10:57:45 -0500 Jens Ivar Jordre <jensivar.jordre@fi.uib.no> wrote concerning "Re: event IO": > Howdy Ian, Djam ++ > > My changes last week were only in BrIOModule's End and Finish > methods to handle successful file closure. Nothing was done to > BrMainModule (See > http://www.sdcc.bnl.gov/brahms/private/list_hyper/brahms-dev-l/1524.html) > > And regarding Djamel's fix I'm happy. A missing file should of > course not stop the whole analysis job. Well, I think the your change plus the thing in BrMainModule was interconnected, so that when you changed the behaviour of BrIOModule, you effectively changed the behaviour of BrMainModule - that is why you need to think about these things not in isolation but in the big picture. Anyway, the way BrIOModule works now (and before) is far from optimal. I imagine we could have something like filesets, corresponding to many files for a single run-level, and a set of these file sets, corresponding to a full job (many run-levels). Yours, Christian Holm Christensen ------------------------------------------- Address: Sankt Hansgade 23, 1. th. Phone: (+45) 35 35 96 91 DK-2200 Copenhagen N Cell: (+45) 28 82 16 23 Denmark Office: (+45) 353 25 305 Email: cholm@nbi.dk Web: www.nbi.dk/~cholm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Nov 05 2001 - 11:13:24 EST