> > I checked out the latest version of BRAT (cf. Djamel's email earlier today). > > It did not compile. The first (and only, so far) problem is that the change > > of names from FFS->Ffs and MRS->Mrs were not propagated to BrParticle.h. I > > will not check in the change since it seems that BrParticle is not used, and > > should either be justified or removed. I choose not to discuss the wisdom > > (or amazing lack thereof) of wasting time changing beautiful, descriptive > > names to (essentially) the same name in a harder to read format. > I second the lack of wisdom of randomly changing class names for the sole > purpose of changing something. On the other hand, Ian is probably wise not > discuss it, because I have discussed it a number of times and the effect has > been very close to null. As I understand it, it is not a change of the names just for the fun of it and it's not a waste of time. The classes were changed a lot (now all deriving from BrGlbTrack), they now all seem to work as they should and they have consistent names. And even if it (for some of us) take some time to get use to the new names I think we should appriciate the big effort that has been put into this, instead of worrying about "FS" or "fs" - I know that this is not a discussion, but I don't get the point in your comments. Claus +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Claus Jørgensen | | Cand. Scient. Phone : (+45) 33 32 49 49 | | Cell : (+45) 27 28 49 49 | | Niels Bohr Institute, Ta-2, Office : (+45) 35 32 53 07 | | Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100, E-mail : ekman@nbi.dk | | University of Copenhagen Home : www.nbi.dk/~ekman/ | +-------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Nov 05 2001 - 20:01:15 EST