> > > > I think you misunderstood me. I ment to say that I did not bump up the > > brat version number (which currently is 1-14-1). And I have set: > > ClassDef(BrTPCSequenceAdder, 0). If I misunderstood you please notify > > me again. > > I didn#t misunderstand you, I just warned you that non-persistent > classes should not have version number different from zero. I > understood what you wrote as: "if the class had affected other > classes, then I would have bumped the version number", which would > have been wrong, since the class is non-persistent, and so I though I > could catch the error in the up-running, before it would cause > grief. It might be a good idea to write a perl script to check the version numbers for consistency- enforce version number 0 for transient objects and make sure the version number changes when the object changes. Ideally, the version number should "change itself", maybe tied to the CVS revision number? -- Konstantin Olchanski Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Long Island, New York olchansk@bnl.gov
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 22 2001 - 21:05:27 EST