Hi truls et al, On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:48:02 +0100 Truls Martin Larsen <t.m.larsen@fys.uio.no> wrote concerning ": Re: New Class BrTPCSequenceAdder": > Oops I replied only to Christian the first time. Her goes again: > > Christian Holm Christensen wrote: > > > > Non persistient classes should have a version number of 0 (ZERO), > > otherwise you'll likely to cause a lot of headaches - see my mails to > > brahms-dev-l on BrEventIO, BrIOModule, and ROOT 3.00 around a month > > ago. The class version is solely for object I/O and hence shouldn't be > > used by non-persistent classes, like say modules. > > > I think you misunderstood me. I ment to say that I did not bump up the > brat version number (which currently is 1-14-1). And I have set: > ClassDef(BrTPCSequenceAdder, 0). If I misunderstood you please notify > me again. I didn#t misunderstand you, I just warned you that non-persistent classes should not have version number different from zero. I understood what you wrote as: "if the class had affected other classes, then I would have bumped the version number", which would have been wrong, since the class is non-persistent, and so I though I could catch the error in the up-running, before it would cause grief. Hence my mail was a friendly reminder and warning, not to give non-persistent classes non-zero version numbers. If I mis-interpreted your intentions, or you understood my mail as en error report, I apologies for the lack of insight/clarity. Yours, Christian ----------------------------------------------------------- Holm Christensen Phone: (+45) 35 35 96 91 Sankt Hansgade 23, 1. th. Office: (+45) 353 25 305 DK-2200 Copenhagen N Web: www.nbi.dk/~cholm Denmark Email: cholm@nbi.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 22 2001 - 07:11:34 EST