Dear Djamel, nice results. Can you give the fraction of how many decay-pions per K0 (or Lambda) are reconstruced at the various rapidities? Is there a simple reason why at y=3 (using the full FS) we don't see any contamination? Your plots suggest an even stronger effect. With best wishes, Dieter On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Djamel Ouerdane wrote: > Hello, > > I wrote a quick note on the lambda and K0s feed down estimation, in reply > to the most serious paper referee comment. You can browse the note here : > > http://www.nbi.dk/~ouerdane/weakdecay > > If you think the results are crazy or the whole thing does not make sense, > tell me asap :) > > The question is : do we want to change the numbers quoted in > nucl-ex/0403050 (the meson paper) ? I don't think it matters that much but > the results I got are a bit crude and overestimated a little ... > > Cheers! > Djam > > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Dieter Roehrich | Institutt for fysikk og teknologi | Email: Dieter.Rohrich@ift.uib.no Universitetet i Bergen | Tel: +47-555-82722 Allegt. 55 | Fax: +47-555-89440 N-5007 Bergen, Norway | http://www.ift.uib.no/~dieter _______________________________________________ Brahms-soft-l mailing list Brahms-soft-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-soft-lReceived on Sat Jan 22 08:12:26 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 22 2005 - 08:12:30 EST