Michael- Attached find some comments you might find useful for the d/p paper. Most of the stuff is typos and such, but maybe there are one or two things to think a little about. It would be nice if we could find a reason to convince the reader that we really have evidence for coalescence not that anyone in our community doubts it. If we use equation 2, for example, do we extract a reasonable size for the deuteron? The paper is quite nice and I don't think there will be much trouble getting it published. Chellis ========================================= Chellis Chasman Physics Department Bldg 510D Brookhaven National Lab Upton, NY 11973 Tel: 631-344-3990 Fax: 631-344-1334 E-mail: chasman_at_bnl.gov -----Original Message----- From: brahms-l-bounces_at_lists.bnl.gov [mailto:brahms-l-bounces_at_lists.bnl.gov]On Behalf Of Michael Murray Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 12:33 PM To: brahms-l Subject: [Brahms-l] BRAHMS Minutes 15 Jan 2010 Minutes of BRAHMS analysis meeting 15th January 2010 ==================================================== Present: Kris Chellis, Michael, JH, Ionus Agenda: http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=80488 v2 draft (20') stephen sanders (University of Kansas) 09:50 K/pi article referee comments (20') Ionut Arsene Steve v2: ========= Steve is using Phobos V2 integral V2 to get the reaction plane resolution. However our integrated V2 does not agree with the PHOBOS input. He would like to rerun Eric's code that simulates our V2 resolution. This requires moving CERNLIB up to 64 bit which requires Flemming. He could try to get a resolution correction by using half the counters several counters but he is not keen that this would be helpful. JH suggested just integrating the pion yield to see if this is consistent with the hadron yield. Steve's main concern now is that our integrated V2 be internally consistent with the assumptions that went into the analysis. Ionos Response to K/pi referees: ================================ Ionos concentrated on just a few of the comments, the minor ones were already fixed in the new text. Referee 1: UQMD give qualitative agreement to K-/K+ and pbar/p Referee: 2 1) He will cite a paper mentioned by the referee on how hadronic resonances can explain the k/pi "horn." 2) He will find a way to include the power law exponents in the paper 3) For the description of Fig7 he now only shown one Teff at mid- rapidity and has tried to reformulate the description how flow depends on the system size. ================ Submitted by Michael Murray ============================== _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jan 28 2010 - 10:36:42 EST