Re: [Brahms-l] QM abstract

What I remember is that for Landau (low energy) the two projectiles 
stop. The system they form expands from a source at y=0 and the mass 
term in the expansion (width of rapidity distribution?) is the mass of 
protons!!  I remember Chelis  made that remark long time ago. This 
could be a deep semantic can of worms.
Ramiro
On Oct 30, 2007, at 11:06 AM, Michael Murray wrote:

> But that is what Landau assumes too. The beam fragments cross and take 
> any angular momentum produced in the collision with them. They leave 
> behind a hot dense medium which expands adiabatically under some 
> equation of state.
> Michael
>
> On Oct 30, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Ramiro Debbe wrote:
>
>> Hi Michael,
>> I understand that small net-proton at y=0 would imply that both 
>> projectiles have crossed each other as per Bjorken model.
>> Ramiro
>> On Oct 30, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Michael Murray wrote:
>>
>>>      Dear Radek,
>>>                how do our net proton yields and saturation of
>>> rapidity loss support the Bjorken picture of heavy ion collisions?
>>> Also the Landau picture was developed for pp collisions. Kris do we
>>> have pion rapidity distribution for pp collisions?
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:43 AM, Radoslaw Karabowicz wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Collaborators!
>>>>
>>>> Attached please find a new version of my abstract for QM08.
>>>> Comments are welcomed, and in fact awaited for.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings, Radek
>>>> <rk_qm2008_abstract.pdf>
>>>> <rk_qm2008_abstract.ps>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Brahms-l mailing list
>>>> Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov
>>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Brahms-l mailing list
>>> Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov
>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l
>>

_______________________________________________
Brahms-l mailing list
Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l