But that is what Landau assumes too. The beam fragments cross and take any angular momentum produced in the collision with them. They leave behind a hot dense medium which expands adiabatically under some equation of state. Michael On Oct 30, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Ramiro Debbe wrote: > Hi Michael, > I understand that small net-proton at y=0 would imply that both > projectiles have crossed each other as per Bjorken model. > Ramiro > On Oct 30, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Michael Murray wrote: > >> Dear Radek, >> how do our net proton yields and saturation of >> rapidity loss support the Bjorken picture of heavy ion collisions? >> Also the Landau picture was developed for pp collisions. Kris do we >> have pion rapidity distribution for pp collisions? >> >> Michael >> >> >> >> >> On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:43 AM, Radoslaw Karabowicz wrote: >> >>> Dear Collaborators! >>> >>> Attached please find a new version of my abstract for QM08. >>> Comments are welcomed, and in fact awaited for. >>> >>> Greetings, Radek >>> <rk_qm2008_abstract.pdf> >>> <rk_qm2008_abstract.ps> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Brahms-l mailing list >>> Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov >>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Brahms-l mailing list >> Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov >> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l > _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Tue Oct 30 2007 - 10:06:25 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Oct 30 2007 - 10:06:45 EDT