Dear Collaborators, Finally we got the good news. I will proceed to celebrate inmediately. Ramiro ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: To_author LA11364 Arsene From: "Physical Review Letters" <prl_at_ridge.aps.org> Date: Thu, May 10, 2007 2:52 pm To: debbe_at_bnl.gov -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Re: LA11364 Production of mesons and baryons at high rapidity and high $p_T$ in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV by I. Arsene, I.G. Bearden, D. Beavis, S. Bekele, C. Besliu, et al. Dr. R. Debbe Bldg 510D Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton NY, 11973 Dear Dr. Debbe, The above manuscript has been reviewed again by the previous referees. We shall be glad to publish it in Physical Review Letters. Please make any remaining revisions as indicated below and send us the final version of the manuscript before we begin processing it. As soon as we receive your response, we will proceed with the publication of your manuscript. Yours sincerely, Christopher Wesselborg Senior Assistant Editor Physical Review Letters Email: prl_at_ridge.aps.org Fax: 631-591-4141 http://prl.aps.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Second Report of Referee B -- LA11364/Arsene ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The authors have appropriately answered to the referees' questions and reacted to their suggestions. I recommend publication of the manuscript in PRL in the present form. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Second Report of Referee A -- LA11364/Arsene ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The authors have improved the readability and clarity of the manuscript, and addressed all the points that I raised in my previous report. I recommend publication. My only very minor comments are these: 1) page 7, 5 lines from top: the authors may wish to substitute the word "both" for the phrase "each one of", since it appears that they are referring to proton and antiproton only in this sentence. 2) on the same page, 2d paragraph, line 3, "simultaneously" is misspelled. On the line below the authors may wish to insert the word "may" before show, given the uncertainties in fragmentation functions. They haven't shown that no possible choice of fragmentation functions could fit this data. If this is their opinion, they could add a sentence to make this point explicitly. In any case, I leave these points to the authors' judgement. _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Thu May 10 2007 - 15:24:10 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu May 10 2007 - 15:24:37 EDT