Hi Flemming, Nice contribution. Here are some minor comments: Page 1, Paragraph 1 Line 3 that that -------> that Line 6 it is not clear what nuclear effects you are reffering to in the statement "..such nuclear effects.." They may be mentioned in the references [1-4], but I think it is a good idea to mention them in the text. Last line time extensive -------> time an extensive Page 2, (paragraph 2 continued from page 1) Line 2 when you say "under these conditions", do you mean high pt, forward angles, transversly polarized beam? If you have something else in mind, you may want to state the conditions under which the SSA was measured. Line 4 "for the observed ... has been", something is incomplete, did you want to say "for the observed large SSA have been ... ? Line 8 ... base of pQCD ----> based on pQCD, page 2, paragraph before section 2 The contribution ----> This contribution Page 2, paragraph 1 section 2 Line 5 for measuring multiplicities, luminosity , and detrmining the interaction vertex, and provides a start time -------> for measuring multiplicities and luminosity , determining the interaction vertex, and providing a start time Page 2 section 2 paragraph 2 Line 4 in front -----> in front of Line 5 followed by a two ----> followed by two Page 2 section 2 paragraph 3 Line 3 did you intentionally leave out H1 because it was not used in the measurement? Since you start the paragraph with a description of the FS, you might want to include it and say PID was done using H2 (with RICH veto) and RICH Page 4 In various palces you say "functions that fragment". I would prefer to say, e.g., "functions that describe the fragmentation" page 5 Line 5 In Fig3 for ... this line seems to be incomplete 3rd line above section 3 considerable ---> considerably page 5, section 3, paragraph 1 Line 3 customary ---->customarily Page 6, paragraph 2 Line 2 excepts ---> except Page 6, paragraph 3 Line 3 ptrange --------> pt range (space) xfrange---------> xf range (space) Line 6 approximate ----->approximatly Page 7, paragraph before summary Line 4 Sivers ----> the Sivers Line 10 The4 -----> The =================== Selemon -----Original Message----- From: brahms-l-bounces_at_lists.bnl.gov on behalf of Flemming Videbaek Sent: Mon 5/7/2007 10:19 AM To: brahms-l Subject: [Brahms-l] winter workshop proceeding Dear Collaborator, Attached is a draft of my contribution on behalf of the collaboration for the winter workshop in bigsky. The material included is taken from the PRL yet to be accepted, and results presented at SPIN2006, and DNP. Part of the text is from these publications. The page limit is 8 pages, which is just met. The deadline (second) is Friday 11 this month. Please send me your comments for finalizing the contribution. regards Flemming -------------------------------------------- Flemming Videbaek Physics Department Bldg 510-D Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY11973 phone: 631-344-4106 cell: 631-681-1596 fax: 631-344-1334 e-mail: videbaek @ bnl gov _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Mon May 07 2007 - 13:26:33 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 07 2007 - 13:27:01 EDT