Hi JH, I'm looking at the 90B1050 challenge which is based on run 14555. I have yet to run the 45 deg MRS maps corresponding to the challenge data at that angle. Sounds like I should run those maps.... ...steve On Aug 7, 2006, at 10:07 AM, J.H. Lee wrote: > Hi, Steve, > > I don't know what "run 5 pp configuration" was used > in the maps. The major MRS settings for run 5 pp were > at forward angles ( < 45 deg) where TFW2 was extended. > There is no way you can get identical maps for the settings. > Is it for low fields at 90 deg? > > JH > > -----Original Message----- > From: brahms-dev-l-bounces_at_lists.bnl.gov > [mailto:brahms-dev-l-bounces_at_lists.bnl.gov] On Behalf Of Stephen > Sanders > Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 9:43 AM > To: devlist Dev > Subject: [Brahms-dev-l] question on MRS acceptance maps > > Hi: I'm finding that the MRS and MRS2 acceptance maps are identical > for the run 5 pp configuration > for which Flemming generated the MRS spectrum challenge. While I > understand this is possible, I am > surprised to find the maps identical. Should I be?, or was the tfw2 > configuration designed to achieve this > result? > ...steve > _______________________________________________ > Brahms-dev-l mailing list > Brahms-dev-l_at_lists.bnl.gov > http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l > _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Mon Aug 07 2006 - 11:17:34 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 07 2006 - 11:17:51 EDT