Re: [Brahms-l] [Brahms-dev-l] question on MRS acceptance maps

From: Stephen Sanders <ssanders_at_ku.edu>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:16:58 -0500
Hi JH, I'm looking at the 90B1050  challenge which is based on
run 14555.   I have yet to run the 45 deg MRS maps corresponding to
the challenge data at that angle.  Sounds like I should run those  
maps....
...steve

On Aug 7, 2006, at 10:07 AM, J.H. Lee wrote:

> Hi, Steve,
>
> I don't know what "run 5 pp configuration" was used
> in the maps. The major MRS settings for run 5 pp were
> at forward angles ( < 45 deg) where TFW2 was extended.
> There is no way you can get identical maps for the settings.
> Is it for low fields at 90 deg?
>
> JH
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: brahms-dev-l-bounces_at_lists.bnl.gov
> [mailto:brahms-dev-l-bounces_at_lists.bnl.gov] On Behalf Of Stephen  
> Sanders
> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 9:43 AM
> To: devlist Dev
> Subject: [Brahms-dev-l] question on MRS acceptance maps
>
> Hi:  I'm finding that the MRS and MRS2 acceptance maps are identical
> for the run 5 pp configuration
> for which Flemming generated the MRS spectrum challenge.  While I
> understand this is possible, I am
> surprised to find the maps identical.  Should I be?, or was the tfw2
> configuration designed to achieve this
> result?
> ...steve
> _______________________________________________
> Brahms-dev-l mailing list
> Brahms-dev-l_at_lists.bnl.gov
> http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l
>

_______________________________________________
Brahms-l mailing list
Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov
http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l
Received on Mon Aug 07 2006 - 11:17:34 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 07 2006 - 11:17:51 EDT