Hi Flemming, Peter, Thank you for your prompt reply. I'm trying now to find what could be wrong in my analysis. The problem at mid-rapidity seems to be the biggest one since I get pion ratios significantly different than 1. First I want to point out the rough results that come out from the analysis. At 0-10% centrality, around mid-rapidity, the yields are: 165 for pions, ~24 for kaons, ~17 for protons, ~8 for anti-protons. The ratios are ~1 for pions, 0.9-0.95 for kaons, ~0.5 for pbar/p. The net proton yield at mid-rapidity is aprox. 9 (at 200GeV was 7). At least for mesons the numbers seems to be right, following the Landau formula, as Peter said. The corrections that I used are: acceptance, tracking efficiency (only for FS because it seems that in the dst version that I used the MRS hits was not available and I could not use Truls's curves), pid efficiency, decay, multiple scattering and absorption for anti-protons. The acceptance maps are maked with the 'generateMaps' script. I think is basicly Peter's work. As Trine suggested, for the MRS, I tryied to use only data from one polarity at a time, e.g. \pi^{+} only from A polarity settings, and compare the results. Doing this I observed a correlation between the setting that I used and the resulting yield. The spectra is very well fitted at mid-rapidity, so maybe this can come from the acceptance maps? Ionut P.S. Please reply at this address, since my address from the brahms-l seems not to be available at the moment On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Peter H.L. Christiansen wrote: > Hi Ionut, > > A few comments: > If it is possible I would make a 0-5% sample, becuase it is well known > that theorists (ok, most people) only remember values for this centrality > class. > > I think that for a fixed centrality class dN/dy \propto s^(0.25) (Landau) > so that you would expect the yields to be sqrt(63.0/200.0)~0.56 times the > 200 GeV yields. We published ca. dN/dy(y=0)=290 pions and dN/dy(y=0)=180 > kaons, so I would expect your yields to be roughly 160 and 100. The fit to > the dN/dy curves should be done with Gaussians with fixed mean (0) or at > least be symmetrical in y (K+ looks strange). There you could compare the > width to the Landau estimate: sigma^2 = ln (gamma_beam). > > If I were you I would focus on 1 specie e.g. pions where statistic is not > a problem. Then I would cut down on centrality classes and do maybe 0-5% > and 30-40%. > > About pions: As Flemming writes more details are needed, but what is a > great idea (and not so difficults) is to make a plot of the yield in the > acceptance range which should be damn close for pi+ and pi- (if you use > the same range) and then the extrapolated yield from the fit, so that you > can see the acceptance coverage. It is fx. clear that your fits don't have > the same shape for pion spectra which is usually the case (both as a > function of rapidity and centrality). > > I think there is a really good story with the pion yields alone..... > > Cheers, > Peter > > P.s: I'm really looking forward to the final net-proton spectra!!!!! > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Ionut Christian Arsene wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > I obtained some results from the Au+Au 63 AGeV data run. A part of the > > graphs are posted at the following address: > > http://www4.rcf.bnl.gov/~aic/. > > In the next days I will update the page with new plots. > > I would like to present these results at the workshop that will take > > place in Bergen at the end of this month, so I will appreciate your > > comments and sugestions about these results. > > > > Regards, > > Ionut > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Brahms-l mailing list > > Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov > > http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l > > > > -- > :-) --------------------------- )-: > Peter H L Christiansen > pchristi@nbi.dk / (+41)764870425 > :-D --------------------------- \-: > > > _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Mon Mar 21 08:31:32 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 21 2005 - 08:31:41 EST