Hi, I finished but found only one more: page 23: line 39: remove "a" in a color One could also ask why we quote both 48,58 on page 15, since the plot and careful analysis was done in 48. I think our understanding of the data has improved a lot since QM02 so maybe we shouldn't quote them when we have published the data (also with mesons and stopping). I think it is a great paper. Cheers, Peter On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Peter H.L. Christiansen wrote: > Hi, > > I have found the following corrections in section 1-3: > page 6: > line 26: 0-10% => 0-5% > line 42: 2.0+-0.4 => 2.0+-0.1 (or 1.45 < dy < 2.45) > > page 25: > line 35: P.Christiansen => STAR Collaboration, C. Adler > In general reference 19 is way to long and I would reduce it to our PRL > only and skip the rest and maybe add: "and references therein". This is > our specialty and there is no reason to quote the other experiments or our > old proceedings with less optimal results. (I would of course also be > happy to keep the reference to my Ph.D. thesis:) > Finally one should change line 33 so that > BRAHMS Collaboration becomes BRAHMS Collaboration, I.G. Bearden, et al > to match the other references. > line 43: Ph.D. Thesis => Submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. > > I will continue to read, but just wanted to make sure to get this in the > paper. > > Cheers, > Peter > > -- > :-) --------------------------- )-: > Peter H L Christiansen > pchristi@nbi.dk / (+41)764870425 > :-D --------------------------- \-: > > > _______________________________________________ > Brahms-l mailing list > Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov > http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l > -- :-) --------------------------- )-: Peter H L Christiansen pchristi@nbi.dk / (+41)764870425 :-D --------------------------- \-: _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Thu Mar 10 12:31:30 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 10 2005 - 12:31:45 EST