Ciao Pawel, Yes, I used tau = 1fm/c. I also would like to point out that <E_t> should be read <E>, it's a typo (<E> = <mt> coshy). Djam On Wed, 19 May 2004, Pawel Staszel wrote: > Hi Djamel, > Thanks for the plot. > I guess that you got 4.95 using tau=1fm/c in the Bjorken formula. > My estimate from the dNch/deta was ~4 but I assumed <Et>=0.5GeV. > Because you took proper <Et(Mt)> for kaons and protons which are > significantly larger than 0.5 > it seems that your result is very reasonably. > > Cheers > Pawel. > _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Wed May 19 03:36:04 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 19 2004 - 03:36:22 EDT