Hi, Two changes since my last posting... 1.) Hiro has supplied new BB data...and has thereby screwed up the good agreement of ampt. 2.) In discussion with Hiro, I realized the Au+Au data had been incorrectly scaled by the total number of Au participants (as indicated) in the figure, rather than the number of participant pairs (what I stated in the text). I think the latter is what we want, and this changes the comparison of the d+Au and Au+Au conclusions. Regards, Steve See: postscript-- http://kunuc6.phsx.ukans.edu/~sanders/dndeta01.ps http://kunuc6.phsx.ukans.edu/~sanders/dndeta01_2col.ps pdf-- http://kunuc6.phsx.ukans.edu/~sanders/dndeta01.pdf http://kunuc6.phsx.ukans.edu/~sanders/dndeta01_2col.pdf tex-- on rcas: ~sanders/dndeta03 _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Sun Nov 23 22:32:08 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 23 2003 - 22:32:25 EST