Perhaps now is the time to dig out old Shakespeare. 'There is a tide in the affairs of men, which taken at the flood leads on to fortune...' Julius Cesar I seem to recall. cheers JJ ____________________________________________________________ Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Sc. Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. Tlf: (+45) 35 32 53 09, secr. (+45) 35 32 52 09, Fax: (+45) 35 32 50 16. UNESCO Natl. Comm., secr. (+45) 33 92 52 16. Email: gardhoje@nbi.dk. ____________________________________________________________ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Murray, Michael J" <mjmurray@ku.edu> To: "Sanders, Stephen J" <ssanders@ku.edu>; "Ian Bearden" <bearden@nbi.dk> Cc: <brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 4:00 PM Subject: RE: [Brahms-l] Re: paper draft mult d+Au > Dear Steve, you took the words right out of my mouth. It seems best to aim for PRL ASAP. Michael > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sanders, Stephen J > Sent: Wed 11/12/2003 8:49 AM > To: Ian Bearden > Cc: brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov > Subject: Re: [Brahms-l] Re: paper draft mult d+Au > > Hi Ian, JJ, Trine, et al. > It looks like they left us a lot of room. I think it is doubtful that > they will be able > to do a 10% binning, as Trine suggest--Certainly their "analog" > counting is subject > to the same constraints as ours. I'm not so sure about the digital, > but I'd still think > they would be statistics limited. We probably need to change the title > of our > paper to include "centrality dependence of". > > ...steve > > On Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 08:42 AM, Ian Bearden wrote: > > > Hi Steve, JJ, > > I printed it out again, and managed to get to the printer first, this > > time. > > Phobos only has min. bias results, and they compare to AMPT, HIJING, > > and parton sat. models. > > The latter, not surprisingly, fails miserably over the entire +-5 > > units of eta, while AMPT and HIJING are over roughly > > eta +-4 > > So maybe a PRL after all? > > -Ian > > On 12/11-2003, at 15.13, Stephen J. Sanders wrote: > > > >> Hi JJ, > >> Thanks for the feedback. I'm open to a Phys. Lett. B submission: As > >> a > >> told Ian earlier, my only concern is that from our experience with > >> the 130 mult > >> paper, its not clear anyone from our community (at least our > >> competitors...) read > >> the journal! > >> > >> I have not seen anything on the Phobos paper. Hiro went to the > >> presentation at > >> the DNP and there they only showed min-bias results (Hiro, correct me > >> if I am > >> wrong on this). The paper had not shown up on their web site as of > >> last > >> evening. > >> > >> I've stated this publicly and privately in the past: Either we push > >> this paper through in > >> the next few weeks, or it is going to lose much of its interest. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Steve > >> On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 02:42 PM, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Dear Steve > >>> I have read the draft for the d+Au. I think it is a nice piece of > >>> work which is practically finished. > >>> I would suggest to proceed with submission as soon as possible and > >>> to announce right away our intention to submit in a week. > >>> Where to send it? > >>> I would suggest Physics Letters B. > >>> Perhaps it could even bear a PRL if the discussion section regarding > >>> the comparison to saturation models is beefed up a bit -although I > >>> have not had the time to study the PHOBOS paper (is there much > >>> overlap?). > >>> regards > >>> JJ > >>> > >>> ____________________________________________________________ > >>> Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Sc. > >>> Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. > >>> Tlf: (+45) 35 32 53 09, secr. (+45) 35 32 52 09, Fax: (+45) 35 32 50 > >>> 16. > >>> UNESCO Natl. Comm., secr. (+45) 33 92 52 16. > >>> Email: gardhoje@nbi.dk. > >>> ____________________________________________________________ > >>> > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Brahms-l mailing list > >> Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov > >> http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Brahms-l mailing list > Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov > http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l > > _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Wed Nov 12 15:07:59 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 12 2003 - 15:08:08 EST