Hi Steve, a few suggestions: 1. Why do we not show minimum bias data (0-92%) in addition? 2. According simulations the uppermost 43% of the cs are full overlapping collisions. I think this is a good definition of a "central" dAu event. (see Eur.Phys.J.C2:643-659,1998). So, what about a bin 0-43%? 3. We could compare to SPS data (hep-ex/9711001). I might have the original data (charged hadrons). With best wishes, Dieter On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Stephen J. Sanders wrote: > Hi Ian, JJ, Trine, et al. > It looks like they left us a lot of room. I think it is doubtful that > they will be able > to do a 10% binning, as Trine suggest--Certainly their "analog" > counting is subject > to the same constraints as ours. I'm not so sure about the digital, > but I'd still think > they would be statistics limited. We probably need to change the title > of our > paper to include "centrality dependence of". > > ...steve > > On Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 08:42 AM, Ian Bearden wrote: > > > Hi Steve, JJ, > > I printed it out again, and managed to get to the printer first, this > > time. > > Phobos only has min. bias results, and they compare to AMPT, HIJING, > > and parton sat. models. > > The latter, not surprisingly, fails miserably over the entire +-5 > > units of eta, while AMPT and HIJING are over roughly > > eta +-4 > > So maybe a PRL after all? > > -Ian > > On 12/11-2003, at 15.13, Stephen J. Sanders wrote: > > > >> Hi JJ, > >> Thanks for the feedback. I'm open to a Phys. Lett. B submission: As > >> a > >> told Ian earlier, my only concern is that from our experience with > >> the 130 mult > >> paper, its not clear anyone from our community (at least our > >> competitors...) read > >> the journal! > >> > >> I have not seen anything on the Phobos paper. Hiro went to the > >> presentation at > >> the DNP and there they only showed min-bias results (Hiro, correct me > >> if I am > >> wrong on this). The paper had not shown up on their web site as of > >> last > >> evening. > >> > >> I've stated this publicly and privately in the past: Either we push > >> this paper through in > >> the next few weeks, or it is going to lose much of its interest. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Steve > >> On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 02:42 PM, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Dear Steve > >>> I have read the draft for the d+Au. I think it is a nice piece of > >>> work which is practically finished. > >>> I would suggest to proceed with submission as soon as possible and > >>> to announce right away our intention to submit in a week. > >>> Where to send it? > >>> I would suggest Physics Letters B. > >>> Perhaps it could even bear a PRL if the discussion section regarding > >>> the comparison to saturation models is beefed up a bit -although I > >>> have not had the time to study the PHOBOS paper (is there much > >>> overlap?). > >>> regards > >>> JJ > >>> > >>> ____________________________________________________________ > >>> Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Sc. > >>> Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. > >>> Tlf: (+45) 35 32 53 09, secr. (+45) 35 32 52 09, Fax: (+45) 35 32 50 > >>> 16. > >>> UNESCO Natl. Comm., secr. (+45) 33 92 52 16. > >>> Email: gardhoje@nbi.dk. > >>> ____________________________________________________________ > >>> > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Brahms-l mailing list > >> Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov > >> http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l > -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dieter Roehrich | Fysisk institutt | Email: Dieter.Rohrich@fi.uib.no Universitetet i Bergen | Tel: +47-555-82722 Allegt. 55 | Fax: +47-555-89440 N-5007 Bergen, Norway | WWW: http://www.fi.uib.no/php/drhrich.html _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Wed Nov 12 14:57:11 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 12 2003 - 14:57:30 EST