Re: PAC presentation

From: Flemming Videbaek (videbaek@rcf.rhic.bnl.gov)
Date: Fri Sep 26 2003 - 09:05:25 EDT

  • Next message: Flemming Videbaek: "Beam Use proposal"
    Hej jens Jorgen
    Thanks for your comments -
    I certainly wanted to have the dn/dy protons it is on my paper draft version,
    and the high-pt points should as you say be stressed more - they do constitute the bulk of the running.
    I will probably show one of the predicted spectra of pions for non-central at high y.
    I will go though the material here today with the gropu+pawel+roman+bjorn-
    I will post an updated version maybe late this evening, so there is one more chance to go though this.
    
    Flemming
    
    
    ------------------------------------------------------
    Flemming Videbaek
    Physics Department
    Brookhaven National Laboratory
    
    tlf: 631-344-4106
    fax 631-344-1334
    e-mail: videbaek@bnl.gov
    
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje 
      To: brahms-l@bnl.gov 
      Cc: gardhoje@nbi.dk 
      Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 4:35 AM
      Subject: PAC presentation
    
    
      Hi Flemming
      Some comments to the draft presentation.
    
      As concerns data already collected, the presentation lacks two central plots, namely the net proton vs y compared to AGS and SPS
      and the high pt suppression at eta=2.2.
    
      This ties into what I also think should be strengthened in the presentation of the wishes for the coming runs: our unique ability to adress the rapidity dependence. This is particularly true regarding the high pt suppression, where we can carry out high pt  'tomography' by varying the angle of observation relative to the beam line . In fact it is a fwd rap. dynamical tomography as the probe and the source compete. Likewise the most forward angles are unexplored and are unique (stopping and search for CGC related effects).
    
      Thus we should emphasize that we want 1) long runs of high luminosity for  rare events (high pt and correlations and 2) clean and stable runs for small angle running.
    
      I think it will strengthen the presentation to clearly identify our points of focus.
    
      cheers
      JJ
    
      ____________________________________________________________
      Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Sc. 
      Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
      Tlf: (+45) 35 32 53 09, secr. (+45) 35 32 52 09, Fax: (+45) 35 32 50 16.
      UNESCO Natl. Comm., secr. (+45) 33 92 52 16.
      Email: gardhoje@nbi.dk. 
      ____________________________________________________________
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 26 2003 - 09:03:32 EDT