From: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje (gardhoje@nbi.dk)
Date: Fri Sep 26 2003 - 04:35:51 EDT
Hi Flemming Some comments to the draft presentation. As concerns data already collected, the presentation lacks two central plots, namely the net proton vs y compared to AGS and SPS and the high pt suppression at eta=2.2. This ties into what I also think should be strengthened in the presentation of the wishes for the coming runs: our unique ability to adress the rapidity dependence. This is particularly true regarding the high pt suppression, where we can carry out high pt 'tomography' by varying the angle of observation relative to the beam line . In fact it is a fwd rap. dynamical tomography as the probe and the source compete. Likewise the most forward angles are unexplored and are unique (stopping and search for CGC related effects). Thus we should emphasize that we want 1) long runs of high luminosity for rare events (high pt and correlations and 2) clean and stable runs for small angle running. I think it will strengthen the presentation to clearly identify our points of focus. cheers JJ ____________________________________________________________ Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Sc. Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. Tlf: (+45) 35 32 53 09, secr. (+45) 35 32 52 09, Fax: (+45) 35 32 50 16. UNESCO Natl. Comm., secr. (+45) 33 92 52 16. Email: gardhoje@nbi.dk. ____________________________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 26 2003 - 04:42:24 EDT