From: Ian Bearden (bearden@nbi.dk)
Date: Tue Jul 01 2003 - 16:50:26 EDT
Hello Krakow! I reply below. On tirsdag, jul 1, 2003, at 17:48 Europe/Copenhagen, Jerzy Cibor wrote: > Dear Claus and Ian, > > Below you can find comments from Krakow group regarding high pt paper > draft 4.0. > > The general comment is that we found the draft a very nice piece of > work. > We also think that the derived physics conclusions are well established > in the contexts of the presented data. > Thank you. > Apart from details other people already mentioned here are our > corrections > and suggestions: > > 1. In the list of affiliations replace "Smoluchkowski" by "M. > Smoluchowski" > DONE > 2. First paragraph: We propose to replace "...extremely hot > high-density > region..." by "...extremely high energy-density region..." - we should > specify what > kind of density we have in mind, e.g. the baryon density is rather low. > > 3. If the 5GeV/fm^3 is from Bjorken formula PS estimates give > 4GeV/fm^3 for the lower > limit, assuming <Et>=0.5GeV, tau_o=1fm/c, radius of Au, BRAHMS > dNch/deta at > mid-rapidity and that the charge particles consist 2/3 of the all > emitted particles. > yes this is how it is done. I think 5 is a not unreasonable estimate (neither is it written in stone, of course). > 4. In Fig.1 one could suspect that (/3) ... (/10) denotes the scaling > factors applied > to the spectra presented, but we think, that we should state it > somewhere explicitly > e.g. in the figure caption. This is in the caption > > 5. Caption of Fig. 3: replace "...at eta =0 and eta=2.2.." by "...at > eta=2.2 and eta=0.." done > > 6. In "200GeV" add a space between "200" and "GeV" (this appears in a > few places). I think I have caught all of these. That is the nice thing about LaTeX...you don't have to worry about the appearance of the document and can concentrate on the content. yeah...maybe if you are Leslie Lamport :-) > > Best Regards, > Krakow Group > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 02 2003 - 11:37:24 EDT