From: Ian Bearden (bearden@nbi.dk)
Date: Tue Jul 01 2003 - 13:58:53 EDT
I thought that this had been done last week. I guess since I never voted on such a policy I'm not bound by it? Wait, I think I tried that argument once before, but the judge didn't buy it... I'll try to get in touch with Flemming and find out if he did send the abstract. -Ian On tirsdag, jul 1, 2003, at 18:28 Europe/Copenhagen, Dana Beavis wrote: > Ian, > > Only a comment on submission. There is a "policy" about the process in > which > RHIC papers are submitted for publication. Not sure I know the > details, I > hope Flemming has given you guys the instructions. I think the > abstract has > to go to the Associate Director and the RHIC Spokespersons 1 week > before it > is submitted. > Anyway, someone must know or can find out, if Flemming did not leave > instructions. > > dana > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ian Bearden" <bearden@nbi.dk> > To: <brahms-l@bnl.gov> > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 10:00 AM > Subject: guess what...a new version! > > >> Dear collaborators, >> >> Here is a new version of the High Pt draft. >> I have tried to accommodate most suggestions, as you will perhaps have >> seen in the flurry of emails in the past few hours. >> Please read this draft very carefully (but quickly!). I hope you find >> it acceptable. >> Best regards, >> Ian > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 01 2003 - 14:03:33 EDT