Re: High Pt paper...partial reply to DB&JHL

From: J.H. Lee (jhlee@sgs1.hirg.bnl.gov)
Date: Fri Jun 27 2003 - 16:00:20 EDT

  • Next message: Stephen J. Sanders: "Re: high pt paper"
    Hi, Ian,
    
    If I read your answer correctly, the differences I see between 
    the old (shown at the meeting) and the new (in the latest draft) 
    figures are not from a simple error in the plot. They indeed are 
    from the differences between old and new analysis. 
    It's a factor of ~2!
    Do we know where the differences come from? 
    
    JH
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Ian Bearden 
      To: brahms-l@bnl.gov 
      Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:39 PM
      Subject: High Pt paper...partial reply to DB&JHL
    
    
      .......
       Yield increases, and correction increases effect stays the same (almost). Not comforting, but it seems to be true. Also the Rcp is not effected by these problems and remains 'nice'
    
      Ian 
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 27 2003 - 16:05:28 EDT