From: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje (gardhoje@nbi.dk)
Date: Tue Jun 24 2003 - 04:08:10 EDT
Hi, When we wrote the paragraph about PID, the underlying idea was to provide an appetizer for the future. This, I´m sure, does not come out from the current paragraph. Maybe we should yank it out. In any case it needs to be rewritten. jj ____________________________________________________________ Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Sc. Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. Tlf: (+45) 35 32 53 09, secr. (+45) 35 32 52 09, Fax: (+45) 35 32 50 16. UNESCO Natl. Comm., secr. (+45) 33 92 52 16. Email: gardhoje@nbi.dk. ____________________________________________________________ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Bearden" <bearden@nbi.dk> To: <brahms-l@bnl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 9:58 AM Subject: Re: High pt paper > I think that pions are about half the particles at high pt, but I have > not looked at these data. IIRC, there are two reasons for looking at > hadrons: 1)Compare to eta=0 and other experiments, 2) Statistics > Claus knows, and I'm sure he'll tell us soon? > Cheers, > Ian > On mandag, jun 23, 2003, at 17:11 Europe/Copenhagen, > yin.zhongbao@fi.uib.no wrote: > > > Hi Ian, > > > >> In the Experimental paragraph, we should either remove stuff about our > >> PID, or use our PID (alternatively, we could say that we do ID > >> particles, but to obtain sufficient statistics, we need to look at all > >> hadrons). > > > > Do you think h¯/pi¯ is very large at eta=2? > > > > Cheers, > > Zhongbao > > > > > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 24 2003 - 04:17:51 EDT