Re: High pt paper

From: yin.zhongbao@fi.uib.no
Date: Tue Jun 24 2003 - 08:00:41 EDT

  • Next message: Hironori Ito: "network disruption tomorrow morning at BNL"
    Dear Claus.
     
    Again, comments on the draft.
     
    First of all, I think the title for the paper is subject to change,
    because it sounds that the high p_t particle production is suppressed in
    both Au+Au and d+Au collisions at 200 GeV. And the dot at the end is no
    need :) 
     
    Secondly, in the abstract: "...indicate a high energy loss of the high
    $p_{T}$ particles..." Shouldn't it be "...indicate a high energy loss of
    hard scattered partons..."? Also similar statements in the paper's
    main body could be subject to change :)
    
    Cheers,
    Zhongbao
    -------
    On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Ian Bearden wrote:
    
    > I think that pions are about half the particles at high pt, but I have 
    > not looked at these data.  IIRC, there are two reasons for looking at 
    > hadrons: 1)Compare to eta=0 and other experiments, 2) Statistics
    > Claus knows, and I'm sure he'll tell us soon?
    > Cheers,
    > Ian
    > On mandag, jun 23, 2003, at 17:11 Europe/Copenhagen, 
    > yin.zhongbao@fi.uib.no wrote:
    > 
    > > Hi Ian,
    > >
    > >> In the Experimental paragraph, we should either remove stuff about our
    > >> PID, or use our PID (alternatively, we could say that we do ID
    > >> particles, but to obtain sufficient statistics, we need to look at all
    > >> hadrons).
    > >
    > > Do you think h¯/pi¯ is very large at eta=2?
    > >
    > > Cheers,
    > > Zhongbao
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > 
    > 
    
    -- 
    -----------------------------------------------------
    Zhongbao YIN                 Phone:  +47-55-582792 (O)
    Address:                             +47-55-276803 (H)
      Fantoftveien 14G 466       E-mail:
      5075  Bergen                  Yin.Zhongbao@fi.uib.no
    ------------------------------------------------------
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 24 2003 - 08:01:29 EDT