CIPANP2003

From: Ramiro Debbe (debbe@bnl.gov)
Date: Tue May 27 2003 - 12:09:40 EDT

  • Next message: McBreen Betty: "rcf e-mail upgrade"
    It was a pleasure to present the work done by Djamel and Peter. Our
      results at y=3 came right at the time people were discussing the
      usefulness of that information. I tried to focus my presentation within
      the context of hydrodynamics because that was the main trust of my
      session.
      You can see my ppt presentation on the BRAHMS page.
      The net charge plot was well received and agrees well with Dima's
      baryon junction prediction.
      The ratio pbar/pion was mentioned several times in previous talks
      (Barbara's and Gyulassy's ) as showing strong deviation from standard
      hadronization seen in e+e- anihilation (where that ratio never exceeds
      0.2) And our results came in right in time. (I had prepared ratios of
      K+P/pi (if flow is responsible for the fact that there are more 
    protons than pions above ~1.5GeV/c
      you want to
      compare heavier to light objects) but Flemming adviced me to show
      pbar/pi to avoid confusion with protons from the fragmentation region.
      It turned out to be really good advice)
      I used that comparison to make my point that transverse flow at y=3 is
      much reduced.
      Once again I felt proud to present results that make our work relevant
      to the community. Maybe because of the dramatic results of the big
      collaborations we somehow fall into a somber mood of being left behind,
      when in reality we hold "a total monopoly at high rapidity" (in the
      words of Gyulassy).
      I will not attend the collaboration meeting in Krakov, but I would like
      to make my point while I'm still elated by our results: I would like to
      push again  to get the dA and p-p results
      out. Once again the community is waiting for the results at forward
      rapidities.
      I also had several people asking about when will our Au-Au results (pt
      distrib and related quantities) be published? I know there are many
      items that need attention, but that would certainly be a paper with
      lots of good physics.
    
      Ramiro
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 27 2003 - 12:10:34 EDT