From: Kris Hagel (hagel@comp.tamu.edu)
Date: Fri Jan 17 2003 - 10:32:44 EST
I answer for the tiny part I know about. No, The changes in TOFW have not been propogated to the DB. I can do that as soon as I have information; Do we need a survey or do we have some at least approximate numbers??? That calls for another expert. Kris Ian Bearden wrote: >Hi, >I think that this may be too broad a mailing list, but I am not sure where >to send this, so you all get to see it...aren't you lucky. If you are not >interested in hardware details of the experiment, you can stop now. > >TOFW: I noticed when looking at the pedestals for TOFW that there are fewer >slats than last year. Then I recalled that Dana mentioned at the collab. >meeting that one panel was removed and the wall recentered. Has this >information been propagated to the geometry data base? >Also, slats 46 and 89 were missing (at least for pedestal run 7343). > >RICH: The pedestals look pretty awful for a lot of the channels. In fact >they look like the H1 and H2 pedestals looked when we had the bad ground >loop problems a couple of years ago (i.e. several peaks, distributed over >many channels). Djamel says that it looked much better in the Aura data >last year. Could an EXPERT look into this. > >Sorry for spamming you all with these details... >Ian > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >| I.G. Bearden | >| Niels Bohr Institute Tb 3 email: bearden@nbi.dk | >| Blegdamsvej 17 phone: (+45) 35 32 53 23 | >| København Ø FAX: (+45) 31 42 10 16 | >| Danmark Www: http://www.nbi.dk/~bearden | > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 10:34:16 EST