From: Ian Bearden (bearden@nbi.dk)
Date: Fri Jan 17 2003 - 09:18:52 EST
Hi, I think that this may be too broad a mailing list, but I am not sure where to send this, so you all get to see it...aren't you lucky. If you are not interested in hardware details of the experiment, you can stop now. TOFW: I noticed when looking at the pedestals for TOFW that there are fewer slats than last year. Then I recalled that Dana mentioned at the collab. meeting that one panel was removed and the wall recentered. Has this information been propagated to the geometry data base? Also, slats 46 and 89 were missing (at least for pedestal run 7343). RICH: The pedestals look pretty awful for a lot of the channels. In fact they look like the H1 and H2 pedestals looked when we had the bad ground loop problems a couple of years ago (i.e. several peaks, distributed over many channels). Djamel says that it looked much better in the Aura data last year. Could an EXPERT look into this. Sorry for spamming you all with these details... Ian -------------------------------------------------------------------- | I.G. Bearden | | Niels Bohr Institute Tb 3 email: bearden@nbi.dk | | Blegdamsvej 17 phone: (+45) 35 32 53 23 | | København Ø FAX: (+45) 31 42 10 16 | | Danmark Www: http://www.nbi.dk/~bearden | --------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 09:20:36 EST