RE: Beam Use Proposal preparation

From: Ian Bearden (bearden@nbi.dk)
Date: Wed Jul 10 2002 - 15:33:20 EDT

  • Next message: Flemming Videbaek: "Re: Beam Use Proposal preparation"

    Hi again, Flemming,
    Could you save the ppt file again.  This time without the automatic timer...
    Thanks,
    Ian
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-brahms-l@bnl.gov [mailto:owner-brahms-l@bnl.gov]On Behalf Of
    Flemming Videbaek
      Sent: 10. juli 2002 21:02
      To: brahms-l@bnl.gov
      Subject: Beam Use Proposal preparation
    
    
      Dear Collaborator,
      Let me give you an update on the little amount of work that has taken
    places for the beam use proposal.
    
      The deadline for submission is eob on Monday August 12. with the PAC
    meeting on August 26
      This means in fact that the I will be at BNL for this
      and can edit a final version over the weekend. Nothing has in fact been
    written - but I have gathered some of the
      thoughts and comments in set of slides - (I also envision these can be
    used for the actual presentation with proper
      added material)  The first couple is the generic Brahms program as set
    forth in CDR
      and at previous PAC meetings. The next sets show what could be the request
    for this and subsequent years and the
      physics rationale behind it.With the expected running of RHIC in 24
    beamsetup + physics the program can accomodate
      as I outlined at the collaboration meeting at most 2 different beam
    species. With this in mind the propose program
      is AuAu + dAu in run-3 and Si-SI+dAu in run-4 (pending on additional
    detectors want might also request Au-Au in the second
      year). Note there is no demand to bring forth the run-4 plans, but it
    looks like a good idea.
    
      The slides can be found either as ppt or pdf file at
      http://pii3.brahms.bnl.gov/~videbaek/BrahmsRun-3.pdf
      http://pii3.brahms.bnl.gov/~videbaek/BrahmsRun-3.ppt
    
      I know many are very busy with the important analysis and prepartions for
    QM talks, but it would be good
      to get comments (references, count-rates estimates, prioritisation for the
    goals, settings) such the outline
      of this document can proceed in the next couple of weeks. With such basic
    material in hand I do not envision the actual writting
      possibly 4-5 pages should be that difficult.
    
      best regards
          Flemming
      ----------------------------------------------------
      Flemming Videbaek
      Physics Department
      Brookhaven National Laboratory
    
      tlf: 631-344-4106
      fax 631-344-1334
      e-mail: videbaek@bnl.gov
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jul 10 2002 - 15:33:12 EDT