Dear Jens Jorgen,
Enclosed, please find the Krakow group comments on RatioDraft3.04.tex:
1. Abstract:
i. 3rd line "...ratios a midrapidity are... " should be
"...ratios at midrapidity are... "
ii.3rd line "...ratios at midrapidity are close to unity "
0.75 +/- 0.04 is also close to to 50 per cent.
We think that such statement (also in the text) is
incorrect.
iii. In the second sentece, the midrapidity results are
compared to the forward rapidities. In the next senetence
the values for the baryon chemical potential are
reversed (i.e. the value for forward rapidty is given
first).
2. In the middle of the first section:
"... the initial nuclei is more significant and ....
... more significant than what ?
...more significant than where?
Please correct our affiliation and acknowledgement:
Our affiliation:
M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Krakow,
Poland
The aknowlegement to "the Jagiellonian University Grants"
should be replaced by:
"the Polish State Committee for Scientific Research (KBN)"
Regards.
Zbigniew
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje wrote:
> This is the latest .tex.
> JJ
> ____________________________________________________________
> Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Sc.
> Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
> Tlf: (+45) 35 32 53 09, secr. (+45) 35 32 52 09, Fax: (+45) 35 32 50 16.
> UNESCO Natl. Comm., secr. (+45) 33 92 52 16.
> Email: gardhoje@nbi.dk.
> ____________________________________________________________
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jul 08 2002 - 04:59:23 EDT