Here (attached) are a few comments/questions/confusion. It is too early to correct english etc form my view point. dana ----- Original Message ----- From: "Claus O. E. Jorgensen" <ekman@nbi.dk> To: "brahms-l" <brahms-l@bnl.gov> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 7:50 PM Subject: ratios 3.00 (fwd) > > Dear Colleagues, > > Version 3.02 of the ratios paper is now ready. You can find it here: > > http://www.nbi.dk/~ekman/RatioDraft3.02.ps > > Thanks for the many comments from many of you. Much, but of course not all, has found > its way into the manuscript. > > Finally we have decided to drop the AMPT comparison. Only the K ratios do not agree so > well. The discussion takes space and the calc. will clutter the otherwise striking fig 3. > We'll save that for a later comparisonor talks. > > We are now at the point where new mods. to the text introduce new errors. > The length is also OK now. > > A careful last proof reading of numbers would be appreciated by fresh eyes. The ambition is > to submit wednesday afternoon. > > regards > Claus and JJ >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 11:17:12 EDT