Re: QM02 abstract

From: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje (gardhoje@nbi.dk)
Date: Tue May 14 2002 - 15:12:52 EDT

  • Next message: Stephen J. Sanders: "Re: QM02 abstract" 

    Hi Michael,
I have a problem with the thermal model at fwd rap.
If we argue that the drop is due to a '2 source picture', then we cannot use
a thermal model to extract any meaningfull chem. pots.
Indeed, we (I) claim that the drop of the K and p ratios at fwd rap. are due
to the inclusion of
direct processes in addition to pair prod. I am not sure that I would
venture the claim that also the
particles of direct origin are in chem. and thermal eq. with the rest.
Do you agree?
JJ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Murray" <murray@cyclotronmail.tamu.edu>
To: <brahms-l@bnl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: QM02 abstract


>    Dear Peter,
>             why not give some hint of what the thermal models
> say about our forward data? What is happening to mu_q and mu_s
> as we go forward?
>                        Michael
>
> Quoting "Peter H. L. Christiansen" <pchristi@nbi.dk>:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I would like to get the collaboratiosn comments on an abstract I will
> > submit for QM02 tomorrow on charged particle ratios. Comments have to
> > here
> > before 10 tomorrow (european time).
> >
> > http://www.nbi.dk/~pchristi/BRAHMS/abstract.ps
> > or
> > http://www.nbi.dk/~pchristi/BRAHMS/abstract.pdf
> >
> > Cheers
> >    Peter
> >
> > --
> > :-) --------------------------- )-:
> >  Peter H L Christiansen @ NBI
> >  EMAIL  : pchristi@nbi.dk
> >  OFFICE : Tb1@NBI  (353 25269)
> >  HOME   : Hjertensfrydsgade 3, st
> >  PHONE  : 33330493(New)/ 40840492(mob.)
> > :-D --------------------------- \-:
> >
>
>
>
> Michael Murray, Cyclotron TAMU, 979 845 1411 x 273, Fax 1899
>
>

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue May 14 2002 - 15:15:54 EDT