Re: First Draft of a ratios paper for 100+100

From: Stephen J. Sanders (ssanders@ku.edu)
Date: Mon Apr 22 2002 - 12:09:47 EDT

  • Next message: Claus O. E. Jorgensen: "Re: First Draft of a ratios paper for 100+100"

    Nice first draft.
    
    I agree with Michael, however, that it would be nice to better characterize
    the rapidity dependence, particularly for the pbar/p ratio.
    Here I'm wondering
    if it would be possible to relate the the width seen for the
    "central plateau" region of the particle ratio with
    the width in pseudorapidity seen for the plateau
    in our multiplicity distributions.  Although it is not quite
    clear from the current Fig 3c, it looks like the plateau might
    be narrower for the pbar/p ratio--or is this a systematic
    issue going from the FS to MRS?
    
    ...steve
    
    > From: "Claus O. E. Jorgensen" <ekman@nbi.dk>
    > Reply-To: brahms-l@bnl.gov
    > Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:53:27 +0200 (MET DST)
    > To: brahms-l <brahms-l@bnl.gov>
    > Subject: First Draft of a ratios paper for 100+100 (fwd)
    > Resent-From: sanders@kunuc2.phsx.ukans.edu
    > Resent-To: SSANDERS@UKANS.EDU
    > Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:53:48 -0500
    > 
    > 
    > Dear collaborators,
    > 
    > 
    > You can find a first draft for a Letter (PRL)  on pi, K and p
    > ratios here:
    > 
    > http://www.nbi.dk/~ekman/RatioDraft1.08.ps.gz  (or)
    > http://www.nbi.dk/~ekman/RatioDraft1.08.pdf
    > 
    > The draft is now being circulated to a paper committee consisting of:
    > CEJ,IGB,JJG,PS
    > JHL,FV
    > MM
    > TT
    > DR
    > whose job it is to work on finishing the story well and diligently.
    > 
    > This is a first draft to give all the opportunity to see where we are
    > heading and to comment up front.
    > So do not hesitate to send comments around on the list for all to see and
    > digest.
    > 
    > Note that the figures and numbers are not final. A reanalysis is in
    > progress to check/improve values and determine  error bars better. Pawel is
    > carrying out a systematic study of correction factors for absorbtion,
    > knockout etc. for the settings used. These have not yet been applied to the
    > data shown and will increase the values
    > by as much as 5%. We need to decide on whether to include p+p,  etc...
    > The layout of figures will be improved by the app. com.
    > 
    > Looking forward to much response (+ and -)
    > best regards
    > 
    > JJ & CEJ
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > ________________________________
    > Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje
    > Assoc. prof. Dr. Scient.
    > Chair Ph.D: school of Physics NBI.f.AFG.
    > (secretariat. 35 32  04 41)
    > Chair science committee. UNESCO Natl. Commission.
    > (secretariat. 33 92 52 16)
    > Office: Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17,
    > 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
    > Tlf: (+45) 35 32 53 09
    > Fax: (+45) 35 32 50 16
    > ________________________________
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Apr 22 2002 - 12:10:50 EDT