Re: 22 Gev dndeta

From: Michael Murray (murray@CyclotronMail.tamu.edu)
Date: Mon Dec 03 2001 - 11:42:01 EST

  • Next message: Dieter Rohrich: "Re: 22 Gev dndeta"

       Dear Bjorn,
                maybe I am misinterpreting the 
    KLM paper. I looked at the EMU02 paper and they
    get dN/deta=400 for the top 4% of centrality.
              Yours Michael
    
    
    Quoting Michael Murray <murray@cyclotronmail.tamu.edu>:
    
    >    Dear Bjorn,
    >             the KLM collaboration has studied PbPb collisions 
    > at the SPS with Emulsion. They are ref [17] of our 200GeV paper.
    > In figure 2 of PRC 62 014903 they plot the multiplicity per
    > wounded nucleon W. They have dN/deta/W = .93 at eta=0 and
    > in Table 2 list W=2*(170+-7). This gives dN/deta=316+-20 at 
    > at eta=0 for 10% central PbPb collisions. They say that they
    > are consistent with another emulsion experiment EMU02 
    > PLB 407 92 (1997).
    >               Yours Michael
    > 
    > Quoting Bjorn H Samset <bjornhs@rcf2.rhic.bnl.gov>:
    > 
    > > On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Hironori Ito wrote:
    > > 
    > > >       Hello.  For appetizer of some people, dndeta for 0-5 %
    > central
    > > > 22 Gev run is about 200 at eta=0 by silicon and tile.  A
    > normalization
    > > is
    > > > done using Hijing to estimate BB counter (trigger 1) efficiency. 
    > (We
    > > > know it is way model dependent.)  The number (200) seems to be too
    > > > low.  Unless someone comes up with better (or right) normalization,
    > > this is
    > > > it for 22 Gev run.
    > > 
    > > ...and TPM1 can (almost)confirm this. Using the same simple
    > > normalization
    > > I get
    > > 
    > > dNdEta ~ 210
    > > 
    > > at eta=0. However: Comparing the BB multiplicity distribution from
    > > geant
    > > with data indicates that assuming a very high efficiency at 0-5% may
    > > not
    > > be correct (the nose of the "min"bias is very round), so a better
    > > normalization may well increase this number. (I.e. we need to
    > properly
    > > digitize the BB response - I haven't managed to do this yet.) Also
    > the
    > > vertex distribution I have used in my simulation isn't quite as flat
    > as
    > > the data sample.
    > > 
    > > On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Michael Murray wrote:
    > > 
    > > >   Another approach is to calculate the average
    > > > dN/dEta for the 100 highest multplicity events.
    > > > Then you don't have to worry about any efficences.
    > > 
    > > This (luckily) is easy - for my top 100 events (using BB mult) I get
    > > 
    > > dNdEta ~ 260
    > > 
    > > Somewhat higher (I might add that the 0-5% sample above was ~2700
    > > events)
    > > - what dNdEta do we expect for this energy?
    > > 
    > > I'll hack away at this some more and send more details as I go along.
    > > 
    > > Ping :-)
    > > 
    > > 
    > > --
    > > Bjorn H. Samset                           Phone: 22856465/92051998
    > > PhD student, heavy ion physics            Adr:   Schouterrassen 6
    > > Inst. of Physics, University of Oslo             0573 Oslo
    > >                               \|/
    > > ----------------------------> -*- <-----------------------------
    > >                               /|\
    > > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > Michael Murray, Cyclotron TAMU, 979 845 1411 x 273, Fax 1899
    > 
    
    
    
    Michael Murray, Cyclotron TAMU, 979 845 1411 x 273, Fax 1899
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Dec 03 2001 - 11:42:30 EST