Re: MULT PAPER. vers. 33. That's it.

From: Stephen J. Sanders (ssanders@ku.edu)
Date: Wed Nov 21 2001 - 12:05:54 EST

  • Next message: Djamel Ouerdane: "Re: run status"

    Hi JH,
    This statement has been bothering me since it suggests I have the wrong
    idea the difference between exclusive and inclusive measurements. 
    With the spectrometer arms we can determe the particle type and
    momentum:  I would consider that to be an "exclusive" measurement
    since we know everything there is to know.  This is  in contrast with,
    for example, the si and tile detectors where we only and deduce the
    number of particles--what I would consider to be an inclusive measurement.
    In this context, I think the wording in the draft if correct.
    Or, are you taking issue with the admittedly abbreviated use of
    "magnetic spectrometers" to stand for "magnetic spectrometers with Cherenkov
    and time-of-flight paritcle identification"?
    
    Regards, Steve
    
    
    > - page 3: "The BRAHMS experiment consists of ... for measuring
    > 
    > exclusive charged particle..."
    > 
    > We measure inclusive and semi-inclusive spectra, but certainly can't
    > 
    > measure exclusive particle spectra.
    > 
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Nov 21 2001 - 12:06:26 EST