Run plan

From: Zbigniew Majka (ufmajka@cyf-kr.edu.pl)
Date: Tue Nov 13 2001 - 12:47:45 EST

Next message: Dieter Rohrich: "Re: 12 degrees"

Previous message: Flemming Videbaek: "magnet settings"
In reply to: Flemming Videbaek: "run plans and rates..."
Next in thread: J.H. Lee: "DC and Run Plan (Re: Run plan)"
Reply: J.H. Lee: "DC and Run Plan (Re: Run plan)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dear All.

I would like to share with you the result of our
discussion here in Krakow on the run plan issue.

Our conclusion is to suggest the measurements at
forward angle (e.g. 3 deg) for a large amount
of remaining beam time.

Justification:
1. All DCs are working and we have to try to use them
   to obtain unique results.
   We know that T5/II is off, we know also that T3 and T5
   are working under severe conditions of a very high background.
   However without such measurement we have no chance to get unique
   results from BRAHMS and we cannot conclude on the future of this
   configuration.
2. Our current analysis allows to be optimistic with help of T2 and H2.

Regards.

Zbigniew

Next message: Dieter Rohrich: "Re: 12 degrees"
Previous message: Flemming Videbaek: "magnet settings"
In reply to: Flemming Videbaek: "run plans and rates..."
Next in thread: J.H. Lee: "DC and Run Plan (Re: Run plan)"
Reply: J.H. Lee: "DC and Run Plan (Re: Run plan)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Nov 13 2001 - 12:49:03 EST